Meh, only good if you have a 3600 on AM4 and really do a ton of productivity / video editing kind of stuff. It is insulting tho that they would treat people like idiots regarding the retarded marketing.
The CPU Marketing Department is just as bad as the Automobile Bean Counters Department from Detroit. Cheapen it or under-engineer it, or do both if you are an overachiever!
I was considering 'upgrading' my current AMD Ryzen 9 5950X with this new processor, until I found out that this Ryzen 9 5900XT is a scaled-down 5950X effectively!π€¬T Thanks, but no thanks!β
hey ppl. when 5950X came out in 2020 was almost $800 and even more expensive is now then the new 5900XT ($345 for starters π ) for the almost the same productivity. So, for ppl like me switching from 5800X to 5900XT is a big jump…. i can see a big difference. Of course if you already have 5950X there is no point to switch. as compared to Intel??? no idea… never ran Intel CPU on my PC LOL
It's surprising how AMD has learned nothing from Intel's recent shady behavior. Looks like trust is being lost at high rates on both CPU manufacturers. Could be a great window of opportunity for Nvidia to just pop in and drop a consumer CPU, finally.
I need guide, you guys think its worth it update from a R5 5600x to a R7 5700x3d? I've seen a lot of videos and seems like it match or its better than the R9 5900x on gaming of course.
Why did you wait all the way until the end to mention that it was launched cheaper than the 5950x? That fact alone helps everybody… when apps start moving twords heavier threaded application design and people start looking at 8-cores like they looked at 4-cores 5 years ago and nobody wants an 8 core cpu anymore, then I hope this CPU will make a little more sense to you guys. I am kind of disappointed with the overall tone of this video tbh, I mean I get what youre saying – yeah its not light years ahead of any of its 8-core competition – but im willing to bet that 5 years from now this cpu compared to a 5800x3D will perform better overall. I'd even wager that when games start using more cores eventually this cpu and the 3d parts will start becoming more familiar with each other on the benchmark scale…
I dont make CPUs or CPU review videos for a living but I will say that I remember a time when Intel was only releasing 4 core cpus for like a decade or more, and charging more and more for it because we had no other option. This is AMD giving you options. I will take this every damn day over what we had between 2007-2018. Stuck with 4 cores.
Steve itβs 6 minutes in and youβve spent 5.5 of it whining about AMD benchmarks instead of talking about the chip. Itβs super tiring. Please tone down the drama in these sort of review videos. I just want to learn and get info. I think you will turn off a lot of people. I get it, AMD marketing skewed some charts or something I just donβt want to watch 6 Minutes about it in the beginning of an almost unrelated video about the chip itself. Itβs way too much. 30 seconds would be fine so I am informed. Then move onto the video.
My final question is, if I put a Ryzen 9 5900xt at 450 watts, what power would it have compared to an i7 1300? Put an i7 13700k at 105 watts and compare, let's do a serious study, greetings
Why are you comparing only in 1080? You know that the difference is much less in 4k. No one will use a 4090 for play in 1080. Even are you using the new setings in vaseline for test the 13700 or not?. And yes the 13700 have a lot of problems of durability and stability
Intel is faster but AMD is way more reliable. Hardware Unboxed are clearly Intel Fanboys, especially with all the bad crap surrounding Intel's latest crap and hypocritical responses towards thei customers. HwU was very late in responding, while other Tech content creators already dived deep into this months ago. Sorry Hardware Unboxed but if people truly shift through your content they can see you are really anti AMD.
what you guys with intel and AMD cpu's means is like 3090 (AMD) vs 3090 ti (AMD) vs 4090 (Intel) . the fact that AMD was not able to manage the chips correctly with the 7950x shows that AMD is not yet very interested in gaming with 10 – 16 core CPU's.
I mean for the right price the 5900xt could be a decent option for someone who needs a lot of cores and already has an am4 motherboard and ddr4 memory. Not great, not horrible. But it's definitely not a gaming cpu so if your primary focus is gaming you're better off with a 5700x3d or 5800x3d if you want to stay on am4. If you're buying a new motherboard and memory then either for productivity or gaming you're better off going with am5
I'd choose the AMD 5900x CPU over any Intel 13th or 14th Processor since Intel's TPD's are waaaaaaay too much just to make them initially appear better for gaming than AMD. However …Intel has screwed themselves with CPU death due to excess heat, degradation & oxidation. π
These CPUs prove to me that AMD is completely capable of doing what Intel did in the quad-core era. They are absolutely willing to make something with marginal gains, heavily slant the press numbers, and outright lie about it.
I'm not sure how you can currently have Intel 13th and 14th Gen chips in your charts, given you don't know whether the current settings are cooking them.
AMD: "5950X3D? nooooo!! It's gonna eat into our AM5 saleeesss! Give them our rest of scrap dies instead, with a fancy name! They already ate up faulty Zen 2 and 3 chips that degrade and crash and freeze into bios with default settings after the warranty expires, but Intel f*cked up more so we are scot-free, surely no-one will read this comment and tell tech Jesus to investigate further..ohh also what about the golden review samples we send? well everybody does it but reviewers are too dumb to know..6900XT that OC to 2.8ghz out of the box? what dummies, took it as a fact; that was 1 in a 100k sample"
if they has made these slightly faster x3d chips that would have been a better use of silcon., i can't imagine the non-x3d versions of zen3 are selling that well compared to zen4, especially with zen5 just days away, with the zen5 x3d parts expected out 3-6 months from now.
Why covering 5900xt ?…really nothing to make video so pulling old info and making it news again ?…the whole reason behind the YouTube channels was to watch ur benchmarks ignoring what company says… its like saying sun raises in east…
This doesn't make sense. You recommend the 5700X3D in the conclusion, but you don't include the 5700X3D in the benchmarks. I agree with you, but I don't agree that it's not included. If you bring it up, then you need to include it in the benchmarks. Which you almost always do, I don't know why only adding the 5800X3D seems enough when that's not the CPU you're recommending. π€
I was wondering what was the point of this CPU when AMD announced it and I am still shaking my head, why release something that already exists. When I heard the claims of the 5900XT being faster than the 13700k I called bullshit, looks like I was right.
It would only make sense if it was around $300 usd.
I guess AMD is just trying to get rid of their 5950 by putting new name on it
What is amd doing broπ
Meh, only good if you have a 3600 on AM4 and really do a ton of productivity / video editing kind of stuff.
It is insulting tho that they would treat people like idiots regarding the retarded marketing.
The CPU Marketing Department is just as bad as the Automobile Bean Counters Department from Detroit. Cheapen it or under-engineer it, or do both if you are an overachiever!
I've learned my lesson with 3900xt. Basically you can never trust amd XT label for a CPU model.
I was considering 'upgrading' my current AMD Ryzen 9 5950X with this new processor, until I found out that this Ryzen 9 5900XT is a scaled-down 5950X effectively!π€¬T
Thanks, but no thanks!β
hey ppl. when 5950X came out in 2020 was almost $800 and even more expensive is now then the new 5900XT ($345 for starters π ) for the almost the same productivity. So, for ppl like me switching from 5800X to 5900XT is a big jump…. i can see a big difference. Of course if you already have 5950X there is no point to switch. as compared to Intel??? no idea… never ran Intel CPU on my PC LOL
Intel really only wins due to pumping 2x the watts in their cpus.
It's surprising how AMD has learned nothing from Intel's recent shady behavior. Looks like trust is being lost at high rates on both CPU manufacturers. Could be a great window of opportunity for Nvidia to just pop in and drop a consumer CPU, finally.
I need guide, you guys think its worth it update from a R5 5600x to a R7 5700x3d? I've seen a lot of videos and seems like it match or its better than the R9 5900x on gaming of course.
Amd makes jokes from intel instability and mess up own processor LOL π
Why did you wait all the way until the end to mention that it was launched cheaper than the 5950x? That fact alone helps everybody… when apps start moving twords heavier threaded application design and people start looking at 8-cores like they looked at 4-cores 5 years ago and nobody wants an 8 core cpu anymore, then I hope this CPU will make a little more sense to you guys. I am kind of disappointed with the overall tone of this video tbh, I mean I get what youre saying – yeah its not light years ahead of any of its 8-core competition – but im willing to bet that 5 years from now this cpu compared to a 5800x3D will perform better overall. I'd even wager that when games start using more cores eventually this cpu and the 3d parts will start becoming more familiar with each other on the benchmark scale…
I dont make CPUs or CPU review videos for a living but I will say that I remember a time when Intel was only releasing 4 core cpus for like a decade or more, and charging more and more for it because we had no other option. This is AMD giving you options. I will take this every damn day over what we had between 2007-2018. Stuck with 4 cores.
5950x still π« π
I still have a 12700k CPU and MB that I never got around to using. I might use it to replace a 3800XT at work. I didn't realize how fast it was.
Wishing they made a 5950x3d
As a 14900KS owner I can tell you the S doesn't stand for stable.
Steve itβs 6 minutes in and youβve spent 5.5 of it whining about AMD benchmarks instead of talking about the chip. Itβs super tiring. Please tone down the drama in these sort of review videos. I just want to learn and get info. I think you will turn off a lot of people. I get it, AMD marketing skewed some charts or something I just donβt want to watch 6
Minutes about it in the beginning of an almost unrelated video about the chip itself. Itβs way too much. 30 seconds would be fine so I am informed. Then move onto the video.
My final question is, if I put a Ryzen 9 5900xt at 450 watts, what power would it have compared to an i7 1300? Put an i7 13700k at 105 watts and compare, let's do a serious study, greetings
5900XT plus 2% == 5950x
Got it. Thank you π
Why are you comparing only in 1080? You know that the difference is much less in 4k. No one will use a 4090 for play in 1080.
Even are you using the new setings in vaseline for test the 13700 or not?.
And yes the 13700 have a lot of problems of durability and stability
Man spent $500 to make a point. Keyboard warrior Gold medalists 2024! (Yes I know, it's also his job and you have to protect reputation.).
Yeah, testing games on a 4090 at 1080p.
Why didn't you try the games at 4K? Maybe there were closer there.
Intel is faster but AMD is way more reliable. Hardware Unboxed are clearly Intel Fanboys, especially with all the bad crap surrounding Intel's latest crap and hypocritical responses towards thei customers. HwU was very late in responding, while other Tech content creators already dived deep into this months ago. Sorry Hardware Unboxed but if people truly shift through your content they can see you are really anti AMD.
Are you jealous of my 7950 3D
if you go to AMD website and compare these 2 CPUs (5900XT and 5950X) there is a line that says:
Package Die Count: 2 (for the 5950x)
Package Die Count: 3 (for the 5900xt)
what does that mean?
After all, this is scrap from the previous generation, so what's the point, my friend from Australia, or God knows where you are?
π
what you guys with intel and AMD cpu's means is like 3090 (AMD) vs 3090 ti (AMD) vs 4090 (Intel) . the fact that AMD was not able to manage the chips correctly with the 7950x shows that AMD is not yet very interested in gaming with 10 – 16 core CPU's.
I hope you can get your money back for this joke Steve
Just why, for the love of God, they named a 16-core processor 5900XT, making it sound like it's a 12-core CPU with a few hundred MHz clock bump?
Well at least they didn't use a RX6400 for their "testing" π
I mean for the right price the 5900xt could be a decent option for someone who needs a lot of cores and already has an am4 motherboard and ddr4 memory. Not great, not horrible. But it's definitely not a gaming cpu so if your primary focus is gaming you're better off with a 5700x3d or 5800x3d if you want to stay on am4. If you're buying a new motherboard and memory then either for productivity or gaming you're better off going with am5
You have to wonder how the conversation goes at AMD before they release that misleading BS.
I'd choose the AMD 5900x CPU over any Intel 13th or 14th Processor since Intel's TPD's are waaaaaaay too much just to make them initially appear better for gaming than AMD. However …Intel has screwed themselves with CPU death due to excess heat, degradation & oxidation. π
AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT we are excited to See on 8Aug in india Market
"we know everything about AM4", arrogance, makes me want to vomit
These CPUs prove to me that AMD is completely capable of doing what Intel did in the quad-core era. They are absolutely willing to make something with marginal gains, heavily slant the press numbers, and outright lie about it.
amd should of showed fps per watt vs 13700k, that would had been atleast legit claim.
I'm not sure how you can currently have Intel 13th and 14th Gen chips in your charts, given you don't know whether the current settings are cooking them.
thanks
Appreciate the bembching
AMD: "5950X3D? nooooo!! It's gonna eat into our AM5 saleeesss! Give them our rest of scrap dies instead, with a fancy name! They already ate up faulty Zen 2 and 3 chips that degrade and crash and freeze into bios with default settings after the warranty expires, but Intel f*cked up more so we are scot-free, surely no-one will read this comment and tell tech Jesus to investigate further..ohh also what about the golden review samples we send? well everybody does it but reviewers are too dumb to know..6900XT that OC to 2.8ghz out of the box? what dummies, took it as a fact; that was 1 in a 100k sample"
if they has made these slightly faster x3d chips that would have been a better use of silcon., i can't imagine the non-x3d versions of zen3 are selling that well compared to zen4, especially with zen5 just days away, with the zen5 x3d parts expected out 3-6 months from now.
Why covering 5900xt ?…really nothing to make video so pulling old info and making it news again ?…the whole reason behind the YouTube channels was to watch ur benchmarks ignoring what company says… its like saying sun raises in east…
This doesn't make sense. You recommend the 5700X3D in the conclusion, but you don't include the 5700X3D in the benchmarks. I agree with you, but I don't agree that it's not included. If you bring it up, then you need to include it in the benchmarks. Which you almost always do, I don't know why only adding the 5800X3D seems enough when that's not the CPU you're recommending. π€
I was wondering what was the point of this CPU when AMD announced it and I am still shaking my head, why release something that already exists. When I heard the claims of the 5900XT being faster than the 13700k I called bullshit, looks like I was right.
Slimy advertising! Here's your regular reminder to never put blind trust in any brand.
mmmm Are these intel sponsored videos…lots of negativity here?
Thanks Steve! πβ