Oh, and you delete comments critical of your positions. No discussion or defense? You ARE who Corday rebelled against, Marat… Don't care if it's the robot or not. Your channel, your sanction, Messieur Marat.
Has the group listened to Mike Duncan's Revolutions? I recommend it. These boys are flying through. The Duncan's podcast goes through the ENTIRE thing. It's season 3 on Apple podcasts
Starts at 4:40. It's confusing to have a video about X that goes on for minutes not talking about X. Compare the Sacred Symbols playstation podcast, and The China Show west-china relations podcast. The first has unrelated talk at the beginning, the latter has at the end, but they're both very clear about this, and they also introduce themselves and their podcast. By the way, everyone talks about the french revolution, but what happened after? the french, especially the anti-insanity people (assuming they existed), had to respond somehow. 1:04:45 RL mentions how france's national identification with military prevented them from holding the army's mistakes. He specifically says this was seen as an attack on france's national identity. Interesting psychology here. This also happens with the american wokes.
@33:09 you show that you’ve not been in Texas long enough. Texans would meet in a football stadium, and the proceedings would be accompanied by tailgate meals and open refreshment stands. Everyone could eat, sit, hear the speakers, use the restrooms… come on. When do we meet? 😄
Day 2 of asking for an 80 year wars video, as it covers the invention of capitalism and the creation of the first Western European republic that is a major power and is also an early example of nationalism
One of my favorites. Love the switch to Austin in the last few episodes – he's so engaged and well-studied. These have become genuinely intriguing conversations. Such a fan!
Colombian reactionary writer Nicolás Gómez Dávila (I think he is mostly untranslated into English) wrote that there hasn't been any real change since the French Revolution. The thing people regularly confuse for change is actually moving faster and faster in the same direction, not a change of direction.
I enjoy learning about French history in detail from foreign channels because they are less biased or provide a different point of view. For example, here in France, anything related to the monarchy or the post-monarchy period is somewhat taboo and frowned upon by the state. During the Revolution, the Vendéans revolted against the Republic, it was a bloodbath ending into a genocide. Yet, this event is barely studied, despite being more violent and extensive than the roundup of Jews during World War II (an event we constantly revisit to emphasize how terrible it was).
Two years ago, a historical movie was made about a hero of the Vendéan revolt. It was a successful film, although pro-government and leftist media completely criticized and attempted to censor it.
I fuck with the small talk it's human and informative
I’m from Northern New York.
Who else is from the North Country?
Oh, and you delete comments critical of your positions. No discussion or defense? You ARE who Corday rebelled against, Marat…
Don't care if it's the robot or not. Your channel, your sanction, Messieur Marat.
Has the group listened to Mike Duncan's Revolutions? I recommend it. These boys are flying through. The Duncan's podcast goes through the ENTIRE thing. It's season 3 on Apple podcasts
Starts at 4:40. It's confusing to have a video about X that goes on for minutes not talking about X. Compare the Sacred Symbols playstation podcast, and The China Show west-china relations podcast. The first has unrelated talk at the beginning, the latter has at the end, but they're both very clear about this, and they also introduce themselves and their podcast.
By the way, everyone talks about the french revolution, but what happened after?
the french, especially the anti-insanity people (assuming they existed), had to respond somehow.
1:04:45 RL mentions how france's national identification with military prevented them from holding the army's mistakes. He specifically says this was seen as an attack on france's national identity. Interesting psychology here. This also happens with the american wokes.
Love the small talk and the back and forth interaction.
Should we educate people on the Political Triangle, so we don't have to keep using someone else's outdated terms?
Small talk is all right but please don't interrupt each other it drives me crazy and makes you look insecure
Rudyard you can tell their politics by the cafe they attend lynch
@33:09 you show that you’ve not been in Texas long enough. Texans would meet in a football stadium, and the proceedings would be accompanied by tailgate meals and open refreshment stands. Everyone could eat, sit, hear the speakers, use the restrooms… come on. When do we meet? 😄
Oui messieurs je suis aussi français 🤌
I love the small talk and learning about you guys
Loved the small talk
Ah nothing like an overly detailed one-hour video to reinforce my violent and healthy bias against Leftism/Communism/Socialism.
Texas would hold their meeting at a football powerhouse high school
I agree with Rudyard that the Fronde should have been won by the nobility and parliament.
But I must also say, I fantasize of what would have been if Louis the 14th had been a Military Genius like Napoleon.
Small talk is nice
Whatever you guys want to talk about, big or small, is good by me.
I don't mind the small talk but if so let the show run more than an hour
1:02:02 that’s actually a neo-liberal framework, in fact leftists are just as anti-regime as right wingers, if not even more.
Day 2 of asking for an 80 year wars video, as it covers the invention of capitalism and the creation of the first Western European republic that is a major power and is also an early example of nationalism
These need a bit more structure
One of my favorites. Love the switch to Austin in the last few episodes – he's so engaged and well-studied. These have become genuinely intriguing conversations. Such a fan!
Colombian reactionary writer Nicolás Gómez Dávila (I think he is mostly untranslated into English) wrote that there hasn't been any real change since the French Revolution. The thing people regularly confuse for change is actually moving faster and faster in the same direction, not a change of direction.
I enjoy learning about French history in detail from foreign channels because they are less biased or provide a different point of view. For example, here in France, anything related to the monarchy or the post-monarchy period is somewhat taboo and frowned upon by the state. During the Revolution, the Vendéans revolted against the Republic, it was a bloodbath ending into a genocide. Yet, this event is barely studied, despite being more violent and extensive than the roundup of Jews during World War II (an event we constantly revisit to emphasize how terrible it was).
Two years ago, a historical movie was made about a hero of the Vendéan revolt. It was a successful film, although pro-government and leftist media completely criticized and attempted to censor it.
Rochester NY mentioned!
Small talk's cool Rudy
I like the small talk. I dont mind if the video goes over an hour
Not a fan of much snall talk.
Excellent. Insights and thought-provocations from both dudes.
Would have loved 3 hours of this. Or more.
I'm fine with the small talk, even though I prefer to skip it, so parsing the video into chapters on each topic would be greatly appreciated
9:24 Karl Popper ?