Balanced, High Performance and…. a Process Lasso, today we test three different ways of configuring mutli CCD ryzens (like the …
[ad_2]
source
Balanced, High Performance and…. a Process Lasso, today we test three different ways of configuring mutli CCD ryzens (like the …
[ad_2]
source
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur.
Thanks for tuning in yall. We got a mixed bag incoming in the next couple of weeks – some X870 and some new Intel Core Ultra Z890 Stuff too.
Though I want to make some used budget builds, what is the best price range you guys want to see right now?
Also you can grab process lasso here if you have a multi CCD ryzen chip https://bitsum.com/download-process-lasso/
I will tell you even more strongly, I have a 10700k and with power saving and whhen amplification mode is turned off, my processor becomes less hot.
Ze Answor is Leenux.
how about ultimate performance power plan and process lasso the games to run on ccd0…..and thanks for not giving the cliche recommendations "it depends"
I've known of Process Lasso decades ago when they were on GiveawayOfTheDay, very reliable program with a reliable developer, a must-have on all my computers.
System reserved set. On 7950x3d reserve cores 0-15 an then set all your tasks to 16-31
would love to know at what speed ddr4 / ddr5 DUAL chan beats ddr4 QUAD chan for the Xeon cpu's on X99 platform.. Also WIndows 11's multi thread update, how does that fair for the old x79's these days? or even OS's that arn't supposed to run it 3/4th 6/7th etc.. ?? 🙂
most ppl will have win11 making your new test useless… the majority of pc gamets buy prebuilt pc.
9950x ccd2 disabled.
6 gh all core 1.2 v
Check that out.
9800x will be a kingpin cpu
I WAS GETTING MORE FPS ON MY RYZEN 7600X3D EVEN THO IT has only one ccd
Hopefully AMD solves this issue
How much of difference do these profiles make on SIGNIFICANTLY OLDER hardware? I am running a Xeon E5-2697v2 with 32gb ddr3 and a sata ssd. Newest component is rx 600 8gb gpu. I am in no position to upgrade even a super budget friendly upgrade is out of reach for me so any extra bit I can squeeze out of my ancient rig is worth it.
Sorry, what did you test? I don´t understand those values. rtx 4090 with 150W ? It was 60fps cap on 1080p or what??
Use stock settings, use balanced dont touch.
Does the AMD Ryzen 5000 series have performance results similar when using Windows Power Profiles for comparison?
on x3d chips this things not make that much a diff then they do on on x3d chips
Thanks for the mention Brian (don't know if it's Bryan or Brian, sorry). I do have to state though that the next dual CCD X3D chips will have 3d cache on both CCDS, making them awesome gaming monsters!
I think the 6 core and 8 core ryzen cpus are also dual ccds with cores disabled and that has been the norm since ryzen 1000 so what difference would the performance mode or balanced mode will show to those low core count ryzen cpus ?
I use ultimate performance. Pretty sure I get less fps but better latency, which is a decent trade off imo.
All good, but I would consider keeping Memory integrity on if you use the PC also for work and are not super defensive on what you run and install.
It protects the kernel from malware that could impersonate drivers.
so i was going to buy i9 14900k last month but i was afraid of degradation prob so instead i bought ryzen 7950x3d now every week i see a new problem about this cpu's wtf
Apologies if you already stated it and I missed it but what about single CCD CPU's like the 7800X3D, Is the High Performance power profile best for performance or just stick to Balanced ?
Ive done my own testing and have found process lasso tends to reduce my performance in games. Especially my 1% and .1 % lows.
Would not recommend it.
If you are on windows 10 you can use an alternative called "Prio" which saves core affinity and priority per task.
Sadly it doesn't work with W11
I always prefer balance over high perf!
I did a test where I wrote a script and with 1 click I could turn off sleep states on my 7950x3D, and then with another click to allow cores to go to sleep. When you activate first profile, you have CPU standing at higher frequencies at all times, not going below 4.3 ghz on 3D chiplet's side, and above 5 ghz on 2nd chiplet (non-3D). Idle/Sleep State profile allows you cores to clock into 300 mhz or even lower on both sides.
In short: sleep states actually allow your CPU to stay higher at 0.1%
On my channel you can see a video called: "7950x3D: Examination of Idle States and 100% Active CPU Core State (RTX 4090) Red Dead Redemption 2"
This is showing exactly what I am talking about and I demonstrate the impact in Red D Redemption 2.
I also run Process Lasso, but I only run 1st CCD (3D) with Hyperthreading OFF, as this is optimal profile for games only, and having 2nd CCD open for other stuff, but I run Balanced Profile, none of this high power bs. Or it will dip your 0.1% lows with something else.
This "high performance" can really screw things up, I wouldn't do it.
this was poorly explained, if lasso is the best you should of showed testing with every method.
between all the numerous power settings you can tweak how about the ultimate performance?
there's another wrinkle, you can use the windows game bar to set as a game to fix the balanced driver controlled performance in games not automatically detected, as you know it pretty much functions entirely using the game bar to operate so shouldn't be a surprise.
I actually game @ 4K 120 on a lot of titles with power saver profile on and the CPU (7800X3D) rarely gets near 60C and performance is still amazing.
Yeah, I have systems with either Win 10 and Win 11, and I use the former the most.
Been waiting for this for quite a while, because i got 7950x3D after dissapointing zen 5 launch and even if set properly and tuned i couldn't atleast match basic 7800x3D results, and i suspected that it might be because even though second ccd is disabled on 7950x3D, it still creates some latency and brings performance down, maximum i could achieve with 7950x3D CCD0 enabled only and tuned in FAR CRY 6 was 276fps compared to your 281fps result of 7800x3D. However results are not repeatable, far cry doens't seem like trusty benchmark. However sad fact is fact 7950x3D cost me only slight more than 7800x3D, but that latency thingy because of two different ccd's even if one is disabled still causes some issues
Everything is becoming too complex now. It's why single CCD / no eCores or disabling eCores is preferred for gaming. No messing around and no potential for anything to go wrong.