Yes, that is correct. AI has been shown to be better than humans at finding problematic images in research papers. This is because AI can scan large volumes of images very quickly, and it is trained to identify patterns and anomalies that humans might miss.
In a recent study, published in Nature, independent biologist Sholto David compared the performance of a human image sleuth with that of an AI tool called Imagetwin. David spent several months poring over hundreds of papers in one journal, looking for any with duplicated images. Then he ran the same papers through Imagetwin.
Imagetwin was found to be both faster and more accurate than David at finding problematic images. It found almost all of the 63 suspect papers that he had identified, and it also found 41 that he had missed.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 26.31 cm (10.4 inch), S-Pen in Box, Slim and Light, Dolby Atmos Sound, 4 GB RAM, 64 GB ROM, Wi-Fi Tablet:-
Get discount using below link
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Intel Core i5 12th Gen 14″ FHD Thin and Light Laptop (16GB RAM/512GB SSD/Windows 11 Home/MS Office H&S 2021/FPR/Backlit Keyboard/Black/1.59 kg), 21E3S04W00 :-
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Intel Core i3 12th Gen 15.6″ (39.62cm) FHD 250 Nits Thin and Light Laptop (8GB RAM/512GB SSD/Windows 11 Home/FPR/1 Year Onsite/Black/1.7 kg), 21E6S0W700 :-
[ad_2]
source
